An Opinion On The Cowbell Topic...
I, like many of you, was not surprised by the news that the SEC is less than pleased with our cowbell usage so far during this season. I am, like all of you, also very much aware of the fact that there are certain times during the game when the cowbell is ok to use. I'm sure we're also all in agreement that this "Cowbell Compromise" was doomed from the beginning. So, knowing all of this, why are we all so ticked off about it?
I can't speak for every Bulldog fan, but I'm willing to give my opinion to anyone that will listen. Let me say from the very beginning that, at least for me, this entire debate can be settled very quickly. The first question we must ask is why are the cowbells such a big issue? How did the new "Cowbell Compromise" come to fruition in the first place? The main reason is that the SEC has had a ban on artificial noise makers for over thirty-five years, and during most of that thirty-five years MSU has pretty much ignored the rule and allowed fans to sneak the cowbells in and ring them anyway. Let me be clear, I agree with the SEC that no stadium should gain an unfair advantage by using artificial noise makers. So, are we gaining an unfair advantage? Well, apparently the SEC believes we are or this wouldn't even be a topic right now.
Obviously, at first glance, this line of thinking is absolutely ludicrous. Davis-Wade is the second smallest stadium in the conference with a capacity of just over 55,000. Even with the cowbells clanging, the sound decibels in Mississippi State simply do not compare with what the other, much larger, stadiums in the conference with crowds averaging near 90,000 people are able to produce.
I would love to see the SEC bring a neutral third party in to measure sound decibels at Davis-Wade and compare them to the larger stadiums in the conference; then make that data available to all of the fans. IF that data backs up their claim that we are gaining an unfair advantage I swear, with hand to my heart, I will put my cowbell back on the shelf for good.
I believe in the spirit of the rule (can you imagine everyone with cowbells in Death Valley?) but I want to see data that will prove to me and everyone else that Mississippi State is gaining an unfair advantage at home games. At this point, I just don't see it.
I'll be at the Kentucky game this weekend and it'll be interesting to see if the fans act any differently now that cowbell usage has become a hot topic this week in the SEC. I will do my best to follow the rules and ring responsibly. My hope is that other fans will do the same.
Yeah, and if a frog had wings...
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not about unfair advantage really...
I listened to an interview with Scott Stricklin. He said that the main reason for keeping the ban in place is that the other schools did not want to deal with their fans being able to bring in noisemakers (air horns, vuvuzelas, etc).
He said that they had conducted decibel studies and that the loudness wasn’t really an issue. He stated that if that is the case, it should be an institutional issue and not a conference issue, and each school can make their own rules about noisemakers.
https://www.forwhomthecowbelltolls.com
twitter.com/mstatesports
by The Bruce Dickinson on Oct 27, 2025 10:58 AM EDT reply actions
I think they'll be 'banned' next year
and we’ll go back to the way it was.. illegal but tolerated and with the occasional warning/penalty during the game.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
by Sasquatch Love on Oct 27, 2025 12:00 PM EDT reply actions
exactly
they were ‘against da rules’ when i was there. it was easy to get em in though.
You can't get there, from here.
by CoastalCowbell on Oct 27, 2025 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Not so fast...
Now that we have had the compromise, the SEC has a way to penalize the school financially that it did not have before. So yes, we can go back to sneaking them in, but this time it will cost us money.
Before, the SEC couldn’t really do anything because the NCAA had removed the artificial noisemaker rule from its books.
https://www.forwhomthecowbelltolls.com
twitter.com/mstatesports
by The Bruce Dickinson on Oct 27, 2025 12:09 PM EDT reply actions
We will be screwed
no matter what happens.
by more_cowbell on Oct 27, 2025 2:09 PM EDT reply actions
stupid lack of linkage
Bulldog vs Bear…(thanks Leo)
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
by Sasquatch Love on Oct 27, 2025 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions
lol
my friend, that video was funny as hell
by Dawgfan246 on Oct 27, 2025 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
it would be awesome ..
…if someone could run that at the state ole miss game in oxford this year on their big screen.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
by Sasquatch Love on Oct 27, 2025 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Forget testing the noise level of the cowbells in our small stadium, I still want to see proof that any number of fans with cowbells is louder on the field than the same number just yelling, whether it’s 55,000 or 105,000. It sounds unlikely, but it’s plausible in my opinion. The way most people ring their cowbells, the open end is pointed up, or at least above the horizon; therefore, the strongest sound waves being produced are traveling up and away from the field. On the other hand, all sound waves from a fan’s voice are going to be directed at the field. My science and/or logic may be totally off, but I think it’s possible that you could give every fan in Death Valley a cowbell and the noise level on the field wouldn’t be any greater than each of those fans yelling. This wouldn’t help the argument against artificial noisemakers in general since, for example, a vuvuzela would unquestionably create much more field noise than one’s voice, but I think there’s a chance in the case of the cowbell as I described it.
by thf24 on Oct 27, 2025 9:39 PM EDT reply actions
by Dawgfan246 on 




